Showing posts with label commentaries. Show all posts
Showing posts with label commentaries. Show all posts

Thursday, April 3, 2014

Advice From a Social Caterpillar

I call myself a social butterfly, but sometimes I feel like my wings haven't quite developed as much as I like to think. On these days--my clumsy, cheerful, Mr. Frumble-y days--I call myself a Social Caterpillar. And sometimes I write about it and think what a hilarious little person I am and what my thought-process must be like to the outsiders. This, the first installment, is for anyone who wants some Advice from a Social Caterpillar.

(social caterpillars are fond of toast.)

The Secret Currency of Gutter-Coins
Always pick up change. People think pennies are like gravel, or gum wrappers, or cigarette butts; you know, the kind of thing that gets in your way and makes noise when you scuff your foot across it, and comes up green and rusty underneath car seats when you finally shop-vac after ten years.
So yeah. Pennies might just be weird disks of metal that get in the world’s way. But some people pick them up, and I heard once that if you get one-hundred of these common-as-bird-stuff annoyances together and drop them on a teller’s desk at a bank, he has to give you a dollar. Isn’t that awesome? And if you were really awesome and gathered five-hundred, that would get you a tall macchiato. Gum-wrappers won’t get you coffee. You could collect five-hundred gum wrappers and march into Starbucks and the barista would laugh at you. You could collect five hundred little rocks and slap them on the counter and the barista would give you a weird look. But if, out of the same gutter, you scraped five-hundred pennies and marched into Starbucks, the barista would give you a weird look and laugh, but he’d have to give you coffee too. It’s the law.
I don’t know who decided that paying with change is stupid. Paying with gum wrappers would be stupid, because gum-wrappers would get soggy if they went through a washing machine. Coins don’t. Paying with rocks would be dumb because if you sat down while you had rocks in your pocket, you’d soon wish you hadn’t sat down after all. Pennies don’t hurt your tush. But paying with pennies and nickels and dimes and quarters is pretty cool. Your pockets feel all heavy, like you’re walking through sand on a warm, sunny beach, and you jingle with every step. Have you ever jingled? Some people have to wear wallet chains to sound cool; not so to the brave soul who will pay with change.
You walk up to the counter and order a drink--a complicated drink, so the nervous kid behind the cash register will have to check three or four boxes on the side of the cup--and the kid says something about the total. You ask for the total again because, you know, paying in pennies and then having three-too-few would be a little awkward.
“Four eighty-three,” he snaps.
When you’re reasonably satisfied you have enough and it won’t end awkwardly, you bring out your faded, twisted ziplock bag of coins and start counting.
The line queues up behind you, but you don’t mind because your pennies and nickels and dimes are just as good as their credit card--better, because you actually have it here with you and aren’t having to pay interest and go into debt. The barista starts frowning like, if you’re going to pay with change, you’re not cool enough for coffee. Do you care? No. Well yeah, you might care just a little bit. In fact, just enough that you’ve lost count and you smile softly at the kid and say, “Sorry, lost track.” and start over again, sliding pennies across the counter with the zingy smell of warm copper mixing with the normal scents of espresso and steamed milk. Your palm starts to warm after getting to three-hundred-seventy-eight and the three-hundred-seventy-ninth penny sticks to your skin. You laugh and shake it off, and it bounces behind the counter. The barista kid just stares at you.
“Could you get that for me?” you ask, because when you’re sorting pennies, everything counts.
“Are you kidding me?” He’s gawking--his scraggly “cool” beard is hitting the top of his green apron because his mouth is open so far.
“I’m not kidding,” you say. “Not unless my total is going down to four eighty-two.”
You give him a cheery smile when he returns your penny because everyone knows everyone else could use a little extra grin in their day, and continue parsing out your coins. It’s taking a long time, and your whole body is warm now, but you’ve gone too far to stop now. You shoot over the final dime and wipe your palms on your jeans.
“Feel free to check my math,” you say in an offhand way that sounds completely innocent but sends the barista into a fit of stiffness that looks like the start of rigor mortis.
“It’s fine.” He dumps fistfuls into the cash register.
“Won’t need anymore change for a while now, will you?” You nod to the people behind you in line; some of them look like they want to laugh--maybe they’re change-spenders too--and the others stand in an empathetic silence, making doe-eyes at the employee. Then, when you’re done with this nodding and smiling, you move off to wait for your drink.
It comes five minutes later, looking absolutely like every other drink that has slid across that counter since 5 a.m. But it’s different. It was paid for with the secret currency of gutter-coins. A penny from the pocket of each person walking by. You plug up the little drink-hole with one of those little sword-straw-things you never know what to do with, and you walk out with a smile on your face. Sure, the employees at this Starbucks will hate you forever more, but you’ve gained a little victory with your hazelnut latte. And as soon as you’ve got more pennies, you’re coming back for more.

The scent of victory is addicting. It smells like copper and foam.

Advice From a Social Caterpillar is an unofficial work in progress and is nothing but a brain-dumping file wherein I muse on life, liberty, and the pursuit of soft pretzels. Also, anything and everything that runs through my crazy little mind. Periodically, if you like it, I might share a new dose or two.

Monday, March 12, 2012

Soup or Salad? A Boxing Match between Hugo and Dickens. :)

I have only about 500 pages of Les Miserables left, which means I am just about 2/3 of the way through that elephantine book. It has been an Olympian task, I will admit, reading this 1463-page giant! I am not finished, of course, but I have found it to be a great stimulant to my mind. It demands me to think.

Think? The nerve!

I am reading the un-abridged version and I will admit that I know why they abridge the book. You see, Victor Hugo, in my opinion, did not decide whether he was writing a book of essays or a novel. Indeed, if you summed up all his dissertations on Waterloo, Napoleon, Convents, Bishops, the Parisian gamin, young love, beauty, guilt, prison, poverty, and everything else, you would find that bit far heavier in page-weight than the actual plot.
This, of course, got me to thinking--if Les Miserables was intended to be a social commentary (as I can only assume it was) what possessed Victor Hugo to write a novel? Okay. Let me first explain myself. I am a Dickens-girl. Every one of Charles Dickens' books are loaded with political, social, and occasionally spiritual commentaries and parallels. They can only be classified as Social Commentaries. So what is the difference between Victor Hugo and Charles Dickens?

Hugo--what a comely old bird!


Dickens--hair brilliantly askew. ;)

The difference is this:
                Victor Hugo made a salad, Charles Dickens made a brew.
               Victor chopped his words up coarsely, Charles stirred and stirred his stew.
               Flavors sep'rate, flavors mingled; both a mighty turn of phrase,
                But the stew will go down quicker--Hugo puts me in a daze.

Ahem. Forgive the lapse into poetry. :P That little ditty is the definition of these two authors in my opinion. Victor Hugo, while an amazing author, bewilders me with his constant division. He carries the plot for a few pages, then casts it aside while he lectures. You almost begin to wonder if his characters serve only as lackeys to carry his social-dissertations. I like his lectures. I like his plot. But in my opinion, he did rather a careless, clumsy job of mingling the two.

Charles Dickens, on the other hand, took his social ideas, his morals, his lectures, and mixed them into his plot and characters so seamlessly that, to speak childishly, "You can't find the pill amongst the jam." I have seldom felt the weariness in reading Dickens that I feel in finding myself at the brink of yet another 30-page ramble through a random history with Victor Hugo for an overly-zealous guide.
Now, please understand that I am not hacking on Les Miserables--I am actually enjoying the book and I will do a review once I am finished. I am merely commenting on Victor Hugo's style and the way he executed all the brilliant things kerbobbling around his mind.
I think it's a case of two men, one who loved his country best, the other his people. Victor Hugo's beloved is France--the country--and though he loves the people, his patriotism outshines his plot. Charles Dickens loved his people--social commentary comes through because he cared about what was happening to his countrymen and wished to set things right. Both men have noble motives--both are fabulous authors.

I suppose you just have to decide on a given day whether you'd rather have a salad or a bowl of soup. :)