1. In a recent post on Scribbles and Ink Stains, you told us
your views on romance in fiction--can you encapsulate your thoughts on the
subject here?
It is my opinion that romance can be a very difficult thing
to write well, but that much of the trouble comes from authors trying to follow
the usual trodden path—the meeting, the sparks, the obstacles, the
resolution. This is the tried-and-true
method; it’s how we’re told to write
romance. But it isn’t the only way to do
so. As writers, we have to consider two
major things: how the romance forms a
part of the plot as a whole, and what
sort of characters the hero and heroine are. The first determines how much
emphasis you will end up placing on the relationship, while the second dictates
what that relationship is going to look like.
2. Do you go by the rule that all fiction should have some
level of romance? If so, elaborate.
I don’t believe that all fiction must have romance. As you pointed out in a comment on the
abovementioned Scribbles and Ink Stains post, stories must have relationships, but they don’t always
have to be romantic in nature. Novels for
younger readers frequently have little, but not always zero (The Gammage Cup, for instance, has a
little bit woven into the plot). I think
that any romance must be organic to the story, not shoved in where it doesn’t
belong or ripped out when it ought to be there.
3. What is romance done well?
I cannot find this quote in the book, but in the 1996 “Pride
and Prejudice,” Jane Bennet says, “A marriage where either partner cannot love
or respect the other…that cannot be agreeable to either party.” Good romance doesn’t depend on passion and
pizzazz; it depends on the love and respect that exist between the
characters. Everything else is but the
icing on the cake—it makes for better eating, but it shouldn’t be treated as
the substance.
4. What is romance done poorly?
I find the worst sort of romance to be the crass kind, but
I’m assuming that is a given. I think of
poorly done romance as the kind where no foundation is laid for the attachment,
nothing given to show that the “love” portrayed is deep and abiding. In essence, where you are presented with the
trimmings but not the actual turkey.
5. In your opinion, who is qualified to write romance?
Anyone who is going to write romance must have at least some
understanding, beyond just the basics, of what Love is. So much of modern writing (and even some
older literature) presents love as nothing but insipid emotions, something that
weakens the character rather than strengthening him. God is Love, and God is by no means
weak. Really, Shakespeare wasn’t far
wrong in one line of his famous sonnet: “O no! it is an ever-fixed mark that looks on
tempests and is never shaken…” Love is
powerful and self-sacrificing, a force to be reckoned with. Writers must begin to see that, I think,
before they can write about it.
6. The three most important elements to well-written
romance?
I am not sure I could give a definitive answer as to the most important elements, but I’ll
combine the hero and the heroine and say “characters,”
and on the heels of that, “chemistry.” The characters must come together in an
interesting manner, no matter how small a part the romance plays in the
story. And then, last of all, I’d also say
that you have to have a story-line to
support the romance.
7. I've heard it said that it is literary suicide to stick
romance in an adventure novel. Do you agree? Why or why not?
I have never heard that, but I heartily disagree! This person has obviously never read The Last of the Mohicans. I never read a more adventurous adventure
novel, but it had romance in it as well.
I think well-written romance can always be used to the author’s advantage,
no matter what genre.
8. A love-interest in a story can either advance the plot,
or prove a foil for the protagonist--how have you portrayed this sort of
character in your novels?
My first thought was that this question was going to be
difficult, but then it occurred to me that these two appear distinctly in two
of my novels, respectively: Wordcrafter and
The White Sail’s Shaking. In Wordcrafter,
Justin’s love interest is Jamie Fairbairn.
She is his opposite in everything: easy where he is uncomfortable,
outgoing where he is shy, changeful where he is steadfast and loyal. Her character serves as the backdrop for
Justin’s weaknesses and strengths; thus, she is his foil.
In The White Sail’s
Shaking, the situation between Tip Brighton and Marta Rais is
different. Their romance serves to
advance the plot, giving Tip one more thing to fight for and Marta one more
thing to be afraid of losing.
9. Popular romance-novels: a worthwhile endeavor, or a waste
of ink and creativity?
There’s creativity involved?
I jest—mostly. In
general I must say I find them a waste of ink, paper, and time, both for the
writer and the reader. Romance is one of
those things best incorporated into a story, rather than made a story in its
own right. There are exceptions,
although even with classic examples, they generally have a secondary purpose;
in general, however, I think this is a good rule to live by.
10. Do you think a novel without romance is possible? If so,
what elements are heightened in place of it?
I think it quite possible, and many of Rosemary Sutcliff’s
novels are good examples of it. Earlier
I mentioned that all novels have relationships; if you don’t have the romantic
sort, which tends to be dominant, others can shine more brightly: friendships,
for example, or familial love. In the
modern onslaught of romance novels, these tend to be neglected and their
importance forgotten.
11. In your opinion, are Jane Austen's books
classified as romance or social commentaries?
12. Which would you rather find in a novel? A love-interest,
or no romance at all?
5 comments:
This entire interview is so brilliant and perfect that I really don't know what to say in response to it. I couldn't pick a favourite answer, either -- they're all spot-on. I'm just delighted that this topic was addressed in such an eloquent and thoughtful way. Thanks, Rachel and Abigail. :D
Great interview you guys!! Abigail's answers to your questions, Rachel, are very helpful. Thanks for posting it, Rachel!
I agree with Megan completely.
Abagail answers are spot-on!
Bravo!
I agree with Megan completely; Abigail, you were spot-on with all of your answers. Many thanks to both of you for sharing this with us; it was quite helpful. :)
Blessings,
Elizabeth Rose
This interview was really great, and so helpful. I really agree with your view on writing romance so much, Abigail. It was really refreshing to read this and thank you, Rachel, for the great interview too. You've got a lovely blog around here =D.
Blessings in Christ,
~Joy @ joy-live4jesus.blogspot.com
Post a Comment